Megatrade, big questions among division rivals, make Toronto an AL East contender
Reuters fileJosh Johnson could be the ace the Blue Jays have lacked since Roy Halladay, provided he can stay healthy.
Opinion
By Tony DeMarco
NBCSports.com contributor
updated 3:26 p.m. ET Nov. 15, 2012
|
They did it the right way ? it figures, as Hall of Famer Pat Gillick was the architect ? growing steadily from 1977 expansion franchise to perennial 1980s contender by emphasizing scouting and player development, and leading the way in Latin American talent. And shortly after moving into the then-spectacular SkyDome, they had the resources to add key veteran free-agent pieces needed to win back-to-back World Series titles in 1992-93.
Fast-forward two decades ? through no more playoff appearances, only one finish as high as second place, and 10 managers (including two Cito Gaston runs) since 1997 ? and the Jays suddenly have become very relevant again.
But let's not get carried away just yet. After all, adding Jose Reyes, Mark Buehrle and John Buck didn't do the Florida Marlins much good in 2012, now did it? And, the Jays are coming off a similarly bad 73-89 season, so they have a long climb up to the American League stratosphere.
Josh Johnson should be the ace they've lacked since Roy Halladay ? if he can stay healthy. Johnson has pitched more than 200 innings only once in seven seasons, and that was in 2009. He also will be in the final year of a four-year, $39-million deal in 2013, so the Jays have him under control for only one season.
In contrast, there's a lot of money ($48 million over three years) tied up in Buehrle, who at some point during this deal figures to fall under the 200-innings mark. Buck ? if he stays in Toronto ? is nothing more than a $6-million-a-year platoon catcher.
And here are a few more ifs for whomever lands the Jays managerial job ? Ricky Romero's rebound, Brandon Morrow's ongoing health issues, Brett Lawrie's emergence, Colby Rasmus' consistency, and the returns from surgery of Sergio Santos and Kyle Drabek.
All that said, the Jays should make a significant jump in wins in 2013 ? possibly to around the 90 mark ? as there are legitimate concerns all around the rest of the AL East:
New York Yankees
At no time since they added CC Sabathia and Mark Teixeira in the winter of 2008-09 have the Yankees needed to spend money more than now. They're very old, have holes in the outfield, rotation, behind the plate, and at DH, and who knows exactly what they will get in 2013 from 42-year-old closer Mariano Rivera.
But instead of spending, the Yankees are concerned about ? another luxury-tax payment? These are not George Steinbrenner's Yankees, and that's not a good thing. The Dodgers are replacing them as the most-extravagant spending franchise, and a handful of other teams have narrowed the payroll gap.
But the problems aren't isolated on the financial side. When they desperately need another influx of homegrown talent, there is little there. No star-caliber talent is ready to step in ? maybe a nice outfield bat in Slade Heathcott, later in 2013. But for the most part, the top organization talent was injured or backslid in 2012.
Maybe they'll land a free agent or two this off-season. Maybe they won't. Maybe they can get another season from their late-30s/early-40s types. And maybe not. The Yankees clearly are heading into a new era facing major obstacles, and no longer seem willing to spend their way to solutions.
Baltimore Orioles
While this season provided so many electric moments after a decade-plus of misery, let's face it, no team is more poised for a 2013 regression than the Orioles.
A 29-9 record in one-run games? A 16-2 mark in extra innings? Finishing 27 games over .500 with a +7 run differential? Only one starting pitcher with more than nine wins and 133 innings pitched? On and on we could go here, but you get the point. Don't stand pat, Dan Duquette. This collection of talent can't repeat what it accomplished in 2012.
And one more stat ? in the last 50 years, teams that improved by at least 24 wins from one season to the next (as the Orioles did this season over last) have fallen back by an average of 11 games in the following season.
The most-recent example are the Arizona Diamondbacks. 2010: 65-97; 2011: 94-68; 2012: 81-81. After a totally unexpected 2011 NL West title, they traded for Jason Kubel and Trevor Cahill, and got a runner-up NL Rookie of the Year season from Wade Miley. But it still couldn't stop the regression.
Tampa Bay Rays
Carl Crawford goes away, the entire bullpen has to be rebuilt, and the Rays still win 90 games. It's an amazing testament to front-office talent evaluation, organizational development and Joe Maddon's managerial skills.
It will be more of the same this winter, with the loss of B.J. Upton in free agency and most likely, either James Shields or Jeremy Hellickson) for some desperately needed hitting. So maybe we should just expect the Rays to win 90 games and contend again in 2013, right?
But this endless cycle of building up only to tear down never gets any easier, and a down season mixed in certainly carries a high percentage of occurrence. Since they flipped the switch to success in 2008, the Rays have had only one 'off-year' ? 84-78 ? in 2009.
Boston Red Sox
After a drama-filled disaster, this is Ben Cherington's team now, and a longer-range plan has to supersede the 2013 won-loss record. The new pieces are being put in place ? from manager John Farrell to pitching coach Juan Nieves with a hitting instructor to come. Stability and a unified organizational approach must come next, and they can only unfold in time.
The financial resources are there for a relatively quick return back to the 2004-2007 run of success.
There also was enough underperformance on last year's roster, particularly in the starting rotation, that a rebound of some sort is a reasonable expectation.
Keep some key pieces ? Jacoby Ellsbury, Andrew Bailey, Cody Ross ? in place, add in a few others ? Mike Napoli, perhaps ? and enough short-term progress would be made. But contending in 2013 likely will be a stretch.
? 2012 NBC Sports.com? Reprintsadvertisement
More newsCabrera or Trout? Answer is yes
??DeMarco: Miguel Cabrera is the right choice for AL MVP. But Mike Trout would have been, too. There isn't a wrong answer here. Just two of the most amazing individual seasons we've ever seen, in divergent ways.
Getty Images fileHBT: Trout, baseball's best player, is denied
HBT: In handing Miguel Cabrera the AL MVP, the voters weren?t making a statement that Miguel Cabrera?s four additional points of batting average, his 14 homers or even his 56 RBI made him a better player than Mike Trout last season. Because this isn?t really about who was the better player.
Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/49843338/ns/sports-baseball/
4/20 student loan forgiveness ufc 145 weigh ins record store day 2012 detroit red wings jose canseco zimmerman
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.