Science Fraud and Legal Action. In the Pipeline:

? An Article That Shows What Med-Chem Is Like? | Main | Anti-GMO. Until This Week. ?

January 4, 2013

Science Fraud and Legal Action

Posted by Derek

There have been occasional links here in the comments to Science-Fraud.org, although I'm not sure if I ever linked them directly or not. Note the use of the past tense: as detailed here at Retraction Watch, the site has suddenly gone (mostly) dark under threats of legal action. Nothing appears on the Wayback Machine at archive.org, either.

I'm not all that surprised. I've said unkind things about people and organizations on this blog, but Science Fraud seemed to have that pedal pushed down to the floor the entire time. And while I've had threats of legal action, I think that I've managed to stay just this side of defamation, although with some people that's hard to do. (I mean for that to be interpreted both ways - both that it's hard to avoid saying nasty things about some people, but also that in such cases, it's hard to think of things that are nasty enough to be defamatory). But which side of that line Paul Brookes, the now-public U. Rochester scientist behind the Science Fraud site, has landed on is still up for debate. More as this story develops. . .

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: The Dark Side | The Scientific Literature

POST A COMMENT

RELATED ENTRIES

? Anti-GMO. Until This Week.

? Science Fraud and Legal Action

? An Article That Shows What Med-Chem Is Like?

? Deal of the Year?

? Overselling p53 Drugs

? How Many Good Screening Compounds Are There?

? Another Recipe: Cornbread

? A Bean Soup Recipe, With Bonus Country Ham Talk, And a Cameo By Frederick the Great

Source: http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2013/01/04/science_fraud_and_legal_action.php

solar flares spanx aurora borealis gcb mary j blige dionne warwick patricia heaton